
Yoon Suk Yeol
In a groundbreaking decision on Friday, South Korea’s Constitutional Court unanimously removed President Yoon Suk Yeol from office, marking a historic moment in the country’s political landscape. The ruling, which follows months of turmoil, comes after Yoon’s controversial declaration of martial law in December, an act that sparked widespread protests and accusations of undermining democratic governance.

Yoon, 64, was impeached by lawmakers for deploying armed soldiers to the parliament in an attempt to thwart a vote that would have overturned his decree. He was also arrested on insurrection charges in connection with the martial law declaration, further fueling the national crisis. The court’s ruling immediately triggers fresh presidential elections, which must take place within 60 days, and authorities are expected to announce a date shortly.
In a statement, Acting Court President Moon Hyung-bae said, “Given the serious negative impact and far-reaching consequences of the respondent’s constitutional violations… we dismiss President Yoon Suk Yeol.” The judges emphasized that Yoon’s actions, including the military deployment for political purposes, violated the core principles of the rule of law and democratic governance. They ruled that these unconstitutional actions constituted a betrayal of the people’s trust.
The decision has sparked strong reactions across the country. Outside the courthouse, Yoon’s supporters expressed their anger, with some shouting threats at the judges, prompting heightened security measures. On the other hand, opposition party lawmakers cheered and applauded the verdict, hailing it as a monumental step for democracy.
“This is a victory for the people,” said Kim Min-ji, a 25-year-old anti-Yoon protester. “We cried tears and shouted that we, the citizens, had won!”
While Yoon defended his martial law decision as necessary to root out “anti-state forces,” the court disagreed, reinforcing the rule of law and rejecting his justification. This makes Yoon the second South Korean leader to be impeached, following former President Park Geun-hye’s removal in 2017.
In the wake of the ruling, police raised the security alert to the highest level, and officers surrounded the courthouse to ensure safety. The national mood was further charged as the South Korean won surged against the U.S. dollar, reflecting the markets’ reaction to the uncertainty surrounding Yoon’s tenure.
Despite the court’s decision, Yoon retains the backing of a staunch group of supporters, some of whom have tragically self-immolated in protest. Yet, many analysts believe this ruling represents the resilience of South Korea’s democracy. “The very fact that the system did not collapse suggests that Korean democracy can survive even the worst challenges,” said Byunghwan Son, a professor at George Mason University.
With the leadership vacuum continuing for months amid a series of crises, including the deadliest wildfires in South Korea’s history, the country now faces a crucial period of political transition. Acting President Han Duck-soo will continue to serve until the new elections are held, marking the beginning of a new chapter in South Korea’s political journey.
As this dramatic legal saga unfolds, South Koreans are left to reflect on the future of their democracy and what lies ahead in the aftermath of Yoon’s impeachment.